Poor Charley Rangel

Let's talk about how the experts are spending your tax money

Re: Poor Charley Rangel

Postby Dghs48 » Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:51 pm

Let's hope so; he's a thief.
User avatar
Dghs48
Polykiloposter
 
Posts: 13202
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 6:09 am
Location: Fishers, Indiana

Re: Poor Charley Rangel

Postby Jack of Hearts » Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:34 pm

Oooo, you tough talking, hulk of a man. I bet you could whup his ass, or at least give it a good tongue lashing! :P
User avatar
Jack of Hearts
Polykiloposter
 
Posts: 17795
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 2:46 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Poor Charley Rangel

Postby Dghs48 » Thu Mar 04, 2010 6:46 am

You sound just like the 8th grader I fought. Rangel is a big cheat who is self centered to the max, whether you want to defend him or not.
User avatar
Dghs48
Polykiloposter
 
Posts: 13202
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 6:09 am
Location: Fishers, Indiana

Re: Poor Charley Rangel

Postby Pragmaticone » Thu Mar 04, 2010 7:22 am

Dghs48 wrote:You sound just like the 8th grader I fought. Rangel is a big cheat who is self centered to the max, whether you want to defend him or not.

A fine upstanding citizen like Jack defending the likes of Charley Rangel?..say it ain't so.
"The government cannot give to anyone anything that it does not first take from someone else." Dr. Adrian Rogers 1931-2005
User avatar
Pragmaticone
Polykiloposter
 
Posts: 27250
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 6:02 am
Location: Music City, TN

Re: Poor Charley Rangel

Postby Jack of Hearts » Fri Mar 05, 2010 1:37 am

It ain't so.
User avatar
Jack of Hearts
Polykiloposter
 
Posts: 17795
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 2:46 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Poor Charley Rangel

Postby Dghs48 » Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:55 am

Obama has assembled the largest group of tax evaders in the history of the republic. Reports are that thousands of government employees owe back taxes as well. This might include many from previous administrations as well, but offers no excuse for not taking action to collect taxes owed.
User avatar
Dghs48
Polykiloposter
 
Posts: 13202
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 6:09 am
Location: Fishers, Indiana

Re: Poor Charley Rangel

Postby Jack of Hearts » Thu Apr 01, 2010 4:37 pm

Oh, yeah! He was on the phone day and night getting them assembled. 16,000 new ones was the number I heard.
No, wait...That was the number of new I.R.S. agents he wanted to hire - Never mind. :|
User avatar
Jack of Hearts
Polykiloposter
 
Posts: 17795
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 2:46 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Poor Charley Rangel

Postby Dghs48 » Thu Apr 01, 2010 6:10 pm

He's the Preasident.....he should not hire tax evaders and he should fire any federal employees who have not paid their taxes. 16000 new IRS agents....unbelievable. All about control, like the rape it is.
User avatar
Dghs48
Polykiloposter
 
Posts: 13202
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 6:09 am
Location: Fishers, Indiana

Re: Poor Charley Rangel

Postby Jack of Hearts » Thu Apr 01, 2010 6:36 pm

You're right, the President should have more important things to do than to personally hire these people.
He should drop everything and, he himself, should physically review every file of those not paying taxes.
You know 'the devil's in the details'. Make Obama micromanage the govt, because everything is his fault.
:roll:
"People often say that motivation doesn't last. Well, neither does bathing - that's why we recommend it daily." - Zig
User avatar
Jack of Hearts
Polykiloposter
 
Posts: 17795
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 2:46 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Poor Charley Rangel

Postby Dghs48 » Fri Apr 02, 2010 6:15 am

Jack, no one is suggesting he personally hire underlings.....he should make it clear what his standards are, and those appear to be very low.
User avatar
Dghs48
Polykiloposter
 
Posts: 13202
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 6:09 am
Location: Fishers, Indiana

Re: Poor Charley Rangel

Postby Jack of Hearts » Fri Apr 02, 2010 8:52 am

Arnie, you specifically said, "he should not hire...", and "he should fire. For you to imply that such hiring and lack of firing are true reflections of his personal standards is, IMO, just mudslinging.
He set a record high target standard for EPA car emissions yesterday; how about an "attaboy" for that one?
:wink:
User avatar
Jack of Hearts
Polykiloposter
 
Posts: 17795
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 2:46 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Poor Charley Rangel

Postby Dghs48 » Fri Apr 02, 2010 9:04 am

Jack: It is well deserved mudslinging for assembling a staff of tax cheaters, and foer taking no action that is visible to clamp down on federal employees (reportedly thousands) who owe the government taxes.

No atta boy for Browner....she is an acknowledged communist.
User avatar
Dghs48
Polykiloposter
 
Posts: 13202
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 6:09 am
Location: Fishers, Indiana

Re: Poor Charley Rangel

Postby Jack of Hearts » Fri Apr 02, 2010 9:52 am

Er...doesn't it take action just to know that your employees aren't paying their full share of taxes? :wink:

Dirty your own hands as you will, Arnie - We all know how high in esteem a mudslinger is held. :oops:

BTW - The attaboy was for Barry; here, let's give him another: http://apnews.excite.com/article/201004 ... 1BN81.html
User avatar
Jack of Hearts
Polykiloposter
 
Posts: 17795
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 2:46 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Poor Charley Rangel

Postby Dghs48 » Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:07 pm

The proof is in the action. When others identify a problem, good manager takes action.

Carol Browner is the EPA chief (communist). No atta-boys from me.
User avatar
Dghs48
Polykiloposter
 
Posts: 13202
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 6:09 am
Location: Fishers, Indiana

Re: Poor Charley Rangel

Postby Dghs48 » Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:46 pm

Sorry, my friend Carol is actually Director of the White House Office of Energy and Climate Change Policy. She is still a Communist.
User avatar
Dghs48
Polykiloposter
 
Posts: 13202
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 6:09 am
Location: Fishers, Indiana

PreviousNext

Return to Government

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron